Introduction: OpenAI, once the undisputed darling of the AI world, is facing an uncomfortable reality check. The much-hyped launch of its flagship GPT-5 model, far from being the triumph many anticipated, has been plagued by performance issues and widespread user dissatisfaction. This isn’t just a minor blip; it signals a potential turning point in the relentless march of large language models, raising critical questions about the current state of AI innovation and the sustainability of its breakneck pace.

Key Points

• The new GPT-5 model consistently underperforms its predecessors and rivals on basic reasoning tasks in real-world use, despite lofty internal benchmarks.
• OpenAI’s decision to deprecate older, more reliable models for standard users forces a downgrade, alienating its core user base and eroding trust.
• This rocky launch hands a significant strategic advantage to surging competitors and questions OpenAI’s ability to maintain its leadership amidst escalating R&D costs and unprofitability.

In-Depth Analysis

The initial euphoria surrounding OpenAI’s GPT-5 launch quickly evaporated, replaced by a chorus of user complaints and eyebrow-raising performance anomalies. What was showcased as a leap forward in AI capabilities has, in myriad real-world tests, stumbled over obstacles even its predecessors, like GPT-4o, navigated with ease. Reports from data scientists and developers reveal GPT-5 failing on fundamental mathematical proofs and elementary algebra problems – tasks that should be trivial for a model of its purported sophistication. The embarrassment extends to its inability to correctly interpret information from OpenAI’s own flawed presentation charts, suggesting a disconnect between its internal logic and practical comprehension.

Perhaps most concerning is the apparent dysfunction of GPT-5’s touted ‘router’ feature, designed to intelligently switch between ‘thinking’ and ‘non-thinking’ modes based on query complexity. User feedback indicates this crucial mechanism frequently defaults to the less capable mode, undermining the model’s performance and leading to frustration. This isn’t merely a bug; it points to a deeper architectural challenge in effectively orchestrating different AI sub-components, a core promise of next-gen models.

The chasm between OpenAI’s internal benchmarks, which paint GPT-5 as a coding prodigy, and its real-world application is equally stark. While benchmarks are often optimized for specific metrics, practical developers are finding rivals like Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.1 superior for ‘one-shotting’ complex coding tasks – delivering complete, functional applications with a single prompt. This disparity highlights a worrying trend: are we developing models that excel in synthetic tests or truly solve real-world problems?

OpenAI’s perplexing decision to gradually deprecate reliable older models like GPT-4o for standard ChatGPT users, effectively forcing them onto a less stable or seemingly less capable GPT-5, has further inflamed user sentiment. This move, while perhaps intended to streamline resources or push adoption, risks alienating a loyal user base who simply want consistent, effective tools. The overwhelming ‘Kinda mid’ and ‘overwhelmingly negative’ social media consensus isn’t merely anecdotal; it’s a direct reflection of users feeling downgraded, not upgraded. This misstep, coupled with the revelation that OpenAI, despite massive funding, remains unprofitable due to its exorbitant R&D, casts a long shadow over its long-term viability and its capacity to sustain its position at the bleeding edge of a rapidly evolving, and increasingly competitive, AI landscape.

Contrasting Viewpoint

Proponents of OpenAI, and indeed, some early power users who received pre-release access, argue that the current negative sentiment is premature. They contend that any new, complex model requires a ‘bedding-in’ period, during which developers and users learn to optimize their prompts and ‘agent harnesses’ to fully leverage its capabilities. Matt Shumer’s perspective, suggesting a ‘time lag’ between release and effective integration, holds some weight; AI models are not static tools. Furthermore, the sheer scale and complexity of a launch like GPT-5 inherently carry risks of initial glitches. It’s plausible that many reported issues are teething problems that will be ironed out through rapid iterations and user feedback loops. However, this perspective often overlooks the fundamental expectation of a ‘next-generation’ model: a significant, demonstrable improvement, not a regression that requires users to relearn basic interaction or troubleshoot fundamental flaws. If the leap forward isn’t immediately apparent or even feels like a step backward, then the onus is on the developer, not solely the user, to prove its worth.

Future Outlook

The immediate 1-2 year outlook for OpenAI, following the GPT-5 debacle, appears far more challenging than it did just weeks ago. The era of unchallenged dominance for any single AI lab may be rapidly drawing to a close. We can anticipate an accelerated arms race, with rivals like Google, Anthropic, and a burgeoning ecosystem of open-source and highly performant Chinese models (e.g., Alibaba’s Qwen 3) aggressively targeting OpenAI’s perceived weaknesses. The biggest hurdles for OpenAI will be regaining user trust and demonstrating unequivocally that GPT-5, or its subsequent iterations, genuinely represents a significant leap forward, rather than a lateral or even backward step. They must address the core performance inconsistencies, particularly in reasoning, and prove that their immense R&D expenditure is yielding tangible, reliable results for the broader user base. Furthermore, the economic realities of running these colossal models will force a pivot towards greater cost-efficiency, a challenge compounded by profitability concerns. The future of leading AI companies hinges not just on raw model size, but on consistent real-world utility and an unwavering commitment to user experience.

For a deeper dive into the economic pressures shaping the AI industry, read our analysis on [[The Unsustainable Costs of Generative AI]].

Further Reading

---

Original Source: OpenAI’s GPT-5 rollout is not going smoothly (VentureBeat AI)

阅读中文版 (Read Chinese Version)